June 3, 2012

BIGBANG - MONSTER M/V (by BIGBANG)

Their comebacks can bring skeptical eyebrow raisers or breathtaking surprises, but it’s a ‘BANG’ either way. Their latest recent ALIVE and Still ALIVE tracks are definitely evidences of their maturing talent- that are undoubtedly still appealing to their maturing fans. Their blockbuster-esque music videos are proofs of their ever-evolving concept-driven fashion style and of course, hair styles (I’m amused by Tae Yang’s prodigy look in here btw). But I guess it’s important seemingly how competitive their music industry has been. Anyways, there’s nothing monstrous about this hit, accept that it’s infectious, and TOP is hot!

June 3, 2012

Thanks for finally coming up with a new album guys. I hope it’ll be worth the wait because I’ve had enough of your DJ sets. Btw, this album trailer looks promising and I can’t wait for August! 

June 2, 2012
What a big difference! Guess it won’t be long till I get a new haircut. ;P

What a big difference! Guess it won’t be long till I get a new haircut. ;P

4:00pm  |   URL: http://tmblr.co/ZElROyMbRhh0
  
Filed under: hair haircut 
June 2, 2012

blackwhiteandginger asked: hi :) I'm not hating on your or anything, but about your last post concerning lady gaga and cher and bowie...I didn't really understand the point of it? Were you saying that these singers can't actually sing, or...? Because Cher is a good singer and so is David Bowie, and Lady Gaga does have a beautiful voice, and Madonna does too (I'm not too sure who Bjork (sp?) is though) ... Did I misunderstand, or...? Could you explain :') I was reading it and I just got confused... :)

Hello there, sorry if the entry wasn’t so clear, I should’ve worked on it’s clarity much better. Anyways, my whole point was, the vocal strength for some pop stars aren’t great, they either sing at a really low pitch like Cher or Bowie, and stay there, or somewhere between medium and high pitch and stay there as well, like Madonna. And because of their lack of vocal strength, they manage to make up for it with the extravagant fashion, personality and theatrical performances. And I think it distracts the audience from focusing on the most important thing in their music, which is their voice. Bjork is an Icelandic art musician who was much famous in the 90s. For her and Bowie, they’re different because they’re also much involved with their own music arrangements. Especially for Bjork, she pays as much attention to the details of her costumes and performance as the gazillion types of instruments she use. 

I’m not saying Gaga is bad, she’s just not that special because there are other pop stars before her who have used pretty much the same methods for fame. 

June 1, 2012
[Flash 9 is required to listen to audio.]

Master of My Make-Believe out in the UK 23rd April // US May 1st
Pre-order on iTunes - http://smarturl.it/santi.mmmb

Get a free download of “Big Mouth” by signing up @ http://www.santigold.com

Holla! This gonna be my badass weekend party track. Hear that tune just before the chorus? It frustrates the hell outta me because I can’t sing that fast. But the tune is super catchy I wanna sing along! Hmph! Santigold is GOLD!

June 1, 2012
In retrospect: the GAGAs before LADY GAGA.

If vocals aren’t your strength, strengthen your visual presentation and make sure it’s extravagantly eccentric. I’m sure even Lady Gaga knows she’s not that good of a singer. She’s more of an entertainer than anything else and she spends more time planning out her costumes, props and concert theatrics before exhibiting them through her mainstream and infectious pop music. But she’s only one of many:

Cher: Besides her countless young lovers, which is still much lesser than the amount of plastic surgery she’s had, this goddess of pop had extravagant wardrobe too. She was the Lady Gaga of the 60s and everybody literally went Gaga over her for decades she had to officially resign from her career. Other pop stars either had their fame gradually dying, or they die. While Cher, she had to tell the world to stop. 

David Bowie: This guy had a music talent so great that he didnt trust his own personality to hold it, he needed to introduce his alter ego, “Ziggy Stardust”, to the world with all its shimmy glitter in the form of glam rock. He had over the top make up, he wore dresses to interviews and some people thought he was gay. Today, he doesn’t have make up on, he wears suits and he is not gay.

Madonna: Remember when she had sharp titties? That was her most Gaga-esque moment. Back when she still spoke with an Italian slang and thought Antonio Banderas was a bad actor because he refused to sleep with her (oops!), yeah she was extravagantly eccentric and used that as her cause to be rebellious. She switched religions so many times before landing on Kabbalah, which scared Guy Ritchie’s barrels off, and scared the Vaticans with her controversial mix of sex and religion. But if you strip all this persona off and just focus on her voice, she is mono-pitched and there is barely any vocal range. But we all still love her for “Material Girl” and “Vogue”. 

Bjork: Now, I’m gonna be overly positive here because I’m a big fan of hers. So everybody, biased entry alert! I’m sure you 90s kids remember her for: wearing that swan costume, bashing up cameramen, making highly abstract music performed in highly artistic and elaborate performances and most of all, you just have to admit that she does seem a bit socially awkward. But hey, out of all the “Gagas” here, she’s the only extravagantly eccentric one who is not driven by fame. She has a bigger vocal range than the rest and her visual presentation is consistent with her elaborate music; using harps, choirs, reactables and God knows what else. Congrats Bjork, you have “Declared Independence” from this list.


Liked posts on Tumblr: More liked posts »